<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSN adCenter not on No1 spot on its own search engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.social-media.co.uk/seo/msn-adcenter-not-on-no1-spot-on-its-own-search-engine-43/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.social-media.co.uk/seo/msn-adcenter-not-on-no1-spot-on-its-own-search-engine-43</link>
	<description>Discussions about social networks, search engines and user driven media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:13:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://blog.social-media.co.uk/seo/msn-adcenter-not-on-no1-spot-on-its-own-search-engine-43/comment-page-1#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.social-media.co.uk/seo/msn-adcenter-not-on-no1-spot-on-its-own-search-engine-43#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Theoretically, MSN should be able to rank first just because they should know the correct way to optimize their page for their own search engine. If they cannot, nobody can. ::)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theoretically, MSN should be able to rank first just because they should know the correct way to optimize their page for their own search engine. If they cannot, nobody can. ::)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

